Assessment, Grading & Feedback
Assessment and Grading Beliefs
- Assessment and grading practices should reflect a rigorous learning environment that is supportive of ungraded practice, mistakes, learning, and ongoing feedback.
- Formative assessments are important for practice and feedback. While summative marks significantly determine a student’s current achievement.
- Habits of Learning are learning behaviors that are separate from academic grades.
- The purpose of grading is to provide students, parents, and staff with honest and clear communication about how a student is performing in a class.
Frequently Asked Questions
- How does standards-based grading differ from traditional grading?
- How does standards-based grading prepare students for High School, College, and Careers?
- What is the purpose of standards-based grading?
- Where else in our area is standards-based feedback and grading being implemented?
- Why did Del Mar Middle School change to Standards-Based Grading?
How does standards-based grading differ from traditional grading?
A standards-based grading system measures a student’s mastery of grade-level standards by prioritizing the most recent, consistent level of performance. Thus, a student who may have struggled at the beginning of a grading period when first encountering new material, may still be able to demonstrate mastery of key content/concepts by the end of a grading period. In a traditional grading system, a student’s performance for an entire trimester is averaged together. Early quiz scores that were low would be averaged together with more proficient performance later in the course, resulting in a lower overall grade than current performance indicates. Under the standards-based grading system, formative assessments over the course of the trimester will measure the skills necessary for students to master in order to successfully complete cumulative summative assessments.
How does standards-based grading prepare students for High School, College, and Careers?
By giving students ownership of their learning, standards-based grading gives students a more meaningful, realistic learning experience. Standards-based grading teaches students self-advocacy skills necessary to achieve in college and/or career settings. Based upon work done by Marzano, Guskey, Pickering, Reeves, Popham, Wiggins, Stiggins, O’Connor, and Brookhart, standards-based grading has increased achievement. Research on standards-based grading has shown that students learn the content on a deeper level and perform better in college when exposed to effective standards-based instruction and grading.
What is the purpose of standards-based grading?
The purpose of standards-based grading is to accurately represent students’ abilities and understanding of clearly defined criteria that align with academic and behavioral standards. Since most standards are written to be learned over the course of an entire school year, standards-based-grading reports on student growth over time instead of on a simple average of points accrued.
Where else in our area is standards-based feedback and grading being implemented?
It is important to note that our elementary schools have been utilizing a similar grading system for several years, so standards-based feedback and grading will look familiar to returning families. A growing number of schools are using report cards that reflect student proficiency on specific standards, including Ross School and Hall Middle School (both feeder schools to Redwood). Numerous teachers in the Tamalpais Union High School District embed standards-based grading practices into their classrooms. Branson High School is a part of a nationwide consortium looking to end A-F grading in high school.
Why did Del Mar Middle School change to Standards-Based Grading?
With the adoption of new state standards in English Language Arts, Math, Social Studies, Science, and Visual and Performing Arts over the last decade, teacher teams have adjusted what they teach and how they engage their students in the learning process. Teachers and administrators dove deep into their own learning and professional development. As part of that process, and as natural next steps, teachers reflected on and adjusted the ways they assess their students, communicate feedback, and grade. Ultimately, the team of educators felt they would be negligent to continue using the traditional A-F grading system, as it does not support the new standards or the beliefs and practices we have embedded into our classrooms.
The change was made so that grades earned by students more accurately reflect what they know and can do. Standards-based grading reports what students know and are able to do within each content area. The real-time monitoring of students' performance reflects a more accurate picture of student achievement. As educators, we want our students to focus on learning and growth, rather than points and percentages. Other reasons for standards-based-grading include:
- Traditional methods of grading do not accurately reflect what a student knows and is able to do.
- Students will be able to explain what they learned or did not learn rather than recite a letter grade or percentage. (i.e. I can describe the process of cell division by mitosis.)
- Standards-based grading provides accurate and meaningful feedback to students, teachers, and parents.
- Standards-based grading helps teachers and students focus and adjust instruction and learning.
- Standards-based grading leads to higher learning through improved accountability and engagement as students have multiple opportunities to demonstrate mastery. (i.e. retakes of assessments or assignments)
- Standards-based grading reports the most recent evidence and trends of student learning.
Research & Resources
- Standards-Based Grading and Reporting will Improve Education, by Marco A. Muñoz and Thomas R. Guskey
- Gearing up for Fast Grading and Reporting, by Ken O’Connor, Lee Ann Jung, and Douglas Reeves
- Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment, by Paul Black and Dylan William
- Why Grades Are Not Paramount to Achievement, by Ashley Lamb-Sinclair
- Beyond Standards-Based Grading: Why Equity Must be Part of Grading Reform, by Joe Feldman
- Improving Grades to be More Accurate and Equitable, by Ken O'Connor
- Reporting Student Learning, by Ken O'Connor and Rick Wormeli
- Grades, College Admission, and Competency-Based Education, by Chris Sturgis
- Letter Grades Deserve an 'F,' by Jessica Lahey
- Time for Change After 120 Years of A-F Grading, by Eric Saibel
You can access the following reports through your local library’s EBSCO database
-
Tiburon/Belvedere residents, go to Belvedere Tiburon Library and click “EBSCO Combined Search.” Enter your library card #, enter the last name of author/researcher.
-
Corte Madera residents, go to Marin County Free Library and click “EBSCO Combined Search.” Enter your library card #, enter the last name of author/researcher.
CAMPBELL, C. Learning-Centered GRADING PRACTICES. Leadership, [s. l.], v. 41, n. 5, p. 30, 2012
FELDMAN, J. Beyond standards-based grading: Why equity must be part of grading reform. Phi Delta Kappan, [s. l.], v. 100, n. 8, p. 52, 2019.
O, C. K.; JUNG, L. A.; REEVES, D. Gearing up for FAST grading and reporting. Phi Delta Kappan, [s. l.], v. 99, n. 8, p. 67, 2018.
GUSKEY, T. R. The Case Against Percentage Grades. Educational Leadership, [s. l.], v. 71, n. 1, p. 68, 2013
GUSKEY, T. R. Class rank weighs down true learning. Phi Delta Kappan, [s. l.], v. 95, n. 6, p. 15, 2014.
GUSKEY, T. R. Five Obstacles to Grading Reform. Educational Leadership, [s. l.], v. 69, n. 3, p. 16, 2011.
GUSKEY, T. R. Helping Standards Make the GRADE. Educational Leadership, [s. l.], v. 59, n. 1, p. 20, 2001.
GUSKEY, T. R.; ANDERMAN, E. M. In Search of a Useful Definition of Mastery. Educational Leadership, [s. l.], v. 71, n. 4, p. 18, 2013.
GUSKEY, T. R.; JUNG, L. A.; SWAN, G. M. GRADES that mean something. Phi Delta Kappan, [s. l.], v. 93, n. 2, p. 52, 2011.
GUSKEY, T.R. Why the Label ‘Exceeds Standards Doesn’t Work’, Education Week, 2014.
MUÑOZ, M. A.; GUSKEY, T. R. Standards-based grading and reporting will improve education. Phi Delta Kappan, [s. l.], v. 96, n. 7, p. 64, 2015.
O, C. K.; JUNG, L. A.; REEVES, D. Gearing up for FAST grading and reporting. Phi Delta Kappan, [s. l.], v. 99, n. 8, p. 67, 2018.
O’CONNOR, K.; WORMELI, R. Reporting Student Learning. Educational Leadership, [s. l.], v. 69, n. 3, p. 40, 2011.
PETERS, R. et al. “It’s Just Not Fair!” Making Sense of Secondary Students’ Resistance to a Standards-Based Grading. American Secondary Education, [s. l.], v. 45, n. 3, p. 9, 2017.
REEVES, D.; LEE ANN JUNG; O, C. K. What’s Worth Fighting Against in Grading? Educational Leadership, [s. l.], v. 74, n. 8, p. 42, 2017.
SENKO, C.; BELMONTE, K.; YAKHKIND, A. How students’ achievement goals shape their beliefs about effective teaching: A “build-a-professor” study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, [s. l.], v. 82, n. 3, p. 420–435, 2012.
SCHERER, M. How and Why Standards Can Improve STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT: A Conversation with Robert J. Marzano. Educational Leadership, [s. l.], v. 59, n. 1, p. 14, 2001.
WIGGINS, G. Toward better report cards. Educational Leadership, [s. l.], v. 52, n. 2, p. 28, 1994
Del Mar Assessment, Feedback, Grading Policies and Practices
Supporting Your Student's Learning